Social Responsibility

EIS ALP is one of the innovative projects supported in 2013. There are many innovative elements of our project, among them the most important are the integration of corporate social responsibility (DO), quality principles and tools of project management activities.

Who inspired us to corporate social responsibility?

Our Institute Eurocoop, is one of the partners in Project EIS-ALP. Project Coordinator CPIP from Romania since 2010, a partner in REPER21 Customer Care social networks, a network that promotes the introduction of indicators of social responsibility in the life and work of NGOs. In the present project we wanted to go one step further and integrate these indicators in the life cycle of the entire project management and in this way the EU supported projects.

What do we want to achieve with this idea?

Maximize the societal contribution of the project:

  • social (decent labor conditions, H&S, equal opportunities, respect of private life, intercultural dialogue, universality of human rights). Here our intercultural dialogue will play a big part, as we are 11 institutional partners from 5 EU member states, and we are as diverse as they get.
  • economic (sustainability, cost efficiency, stability of workplaces, impact on the local community, promotion of CSR, green and solidal economy),
  • environmental (reduce-reuse-recycle, protection of biodiversity and ecosystems, responsible acquisitions, promotion of Rio principles) and
  • governance (ethical communication, involvement of stakeholders during the project lifecycle, transparency, accountability, coordination with other similar projects, lobby and advocacy).

A major part of our project is co-developed with the direct involvement of our stakeholders. They play an essential role, as we believe that only through their direct involvement; our products will be put to good use and developed correctly. We also have a strong linkage with a lot of European initiatives developed on our subject, as we believe we need to build upon the developments made by our partners. And we will implement the project in the most transparent and accountable manner possible, with agreed decisions by partners, with access to all the developments made through public money.

Guarantee that the project results are timely, relevant, and feasible, reach the planned objectives and contribute to the sustainability of the project. Because we do care about the public money, the way they are spent and the results they produced. And we want to see if and how this can be improved.

How do we plan to do this?

1. Develop quality and SR policies that will encompass objectives, implementation tools and responsible teams. The quality policy will be based on the principles of relevance, feasibility and efficiency, whereas the SR policy will be based on the principles of stakeholder involvement, respect for human rights, transparency and ethical behavior. Here you can download out EIS ALP SR policies under the form of a Guide: download societal-guide.pdf

2. Develop quality and SR dashboards based on OVI (Objectively Verifiable Indicators) for the project general results (defining the quality, quantity and delivery time for each output) and for the key SR measures that will be agreed and adopted by the project teams for each WP based on a set of SR indicators already developed by REPER21 based on GRI and ISO 260000. The quality instruments will be further agreed with the external evaluator whose audit will strengthen the team efforts to provide high quality results.

3. Periodical monitor the respect of the quality and SR OVI. The main tools used for the monitoring phase are periodical in situ visits and questionnaires. The monitoring phase will enable to develop and undertake corrective measures based on the discrepancies between the quality and SR policies and dashboards and the implementation realities that will support a constant improvement of the project developments and sustainability.

4. Assess the project’s success in terms of quality and SR based on the PCM criteria of efficiency, effectiveness, impact, relevance and sustainability. The project final quality evaluation will be preceded by a final quality evaluation report that will encompass a specific section of societal responsibility describing the applied SR measures.

Reviw on bokmaker Number 1 in uk William Hill
Full Reviw on best bokmaker - Ladbrokes full information
sports bookmakers
cookie consent